Women corrupting science is ofcourse nothing new as feminists have been doing that for the last forty years by introducing bias and downright lies in documents and studies favouring women and discrediting men and boys. The “1 in 4″ claim is one and also the “Rape” studies as well as the “Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse” studies. All a pack of exaggerated lies, deceitful questioning, misinformation and completely biased.
I lifted this following article from the Bunyiptude blog here, as it is a good and succinct explanation about, not only the corrupt left wing practices, but also how women have no issue at all about joining in the corruption of science.
The Joelle Gergis et al paper did include tow other feminised wimps whom I shall ignore, concentrate on the main culprits.
Being assumed climate specialists does not require any verification apparently, a paper on these subjects can be “Pal Reviewed”, whenever needed by their mates to give it the thumbs up before being presented to the wider scientific community, it does not have to be verifiable apparently, or so Gergis thought, pershaw!!. However, it does still have to pass inspection in the wider community and be able to be reconstructed and tested by anyone who questions the paper, it’s data or assumptions, that is how it is supposed to work. Enter Climate Audit maths guru Steve McIntyre.
Oops, Joelle Gergis et al did not count on that one. They assumed that they could flog some biased bit of imaginary garbage and flog it off as being another example of “every one’s gonna fry” in their beds overnight propaganda. Instead it demonstrated how low these women would go to present a copy of the hockey stick study to match that liar and professional warmist agitator Michael Mann, which he produced all those years back and refuses to withdraw even though it has been ridiculed by scientists all over the world. Now if Gergis et al could only show that the southern hemisphere was frying as well, they would be home and hosed, money would fall from the sky. Meanwhile the Antarctic was exponentially, way too busy freezing at even bigger size to notice.
Corrupt Female Scientists and Corrupt Universities.
Corrupt the science they did, embarrassed themselves completely and hopefully never see a another single tax payer dollar ever again. They should have the dignity to resign and maybe take up something they would be better at like knitting or veggie growing full time. Behaving and claiming to be decent, honest and honourable scientists was just not their forte. Better to lie, try to deceive and exaggerate, why not corrupt the discipline first. A bigger group of shysters and manipulators of the truth would be hard to find. Where is the reaction from that University by the way? They also have no credibility at all as they allow these unconscionable pretenders and frauds to continue in their same positions after wasting over $ 300,000 of tax payer funding.
Now how much credibility do these lying women have now and how much would they now be thanking those supportive feminists that run that University, prompting them with that usual “You Go Girl” mentality and also that endless claim by that hate movement being that women should never be held responsible or ever held accountable for their actions. That worked out really well, didn’t girls. Job well done. Welcome to the real world.
BLAME it on an older Bunyip’s sense of outraged propriety, but of all the assaults on common sense and honesty mounted by ardent warmists the one that continues to grate most of all is that Hungry Beast rap video, “I’m a Climate Scientist“. Now it is true that much larger sums have been squandered on spurious science linking minute twitches of the mercury to all manner of earth-threatening ills, from peculiar fish to the clustered incidence of bearded dwarf women and so forth. But in its own small way, the ABC-funded clip captures every single reason why careerist climateers are to be despised.
There is the adolescent arrogance of the exercise first of all. With only one or two exceptions, the performers are hardly better than children, and there is nothing quite so tiresome as being hectored by a self-righteous teenager. Then there is the ABC’s abuse of its charter, which does not include an obligation to bathe viewers and listeners in streams of obscenity. But most of all, what crawls furthest up an adult’s nose is the sneering of a kind that so often drips from the lips of those who believe themselves so much smarter than the rest of us.
Now, at last, the recent collapse of the Gergis et al paper has provided some delicious consolation. Remember, when not shouting about “sucking d*** in Copenhagen” or using “mother****er” as a form of punctuation, the climate rappers’ oft-repeated refrain is that their work is “peer reviewed” and must not therefore be doubted or dismissed.
Well isn’t that just rich! Amateur rapper and blonde climate careerist Ailie Gallant is one of the co-authors of the discredited Gergis paper, which had sailed through the revered peer-review process and was poised for publication when it was noticed — by whom remains a matter of considerable debate — that the paper’s claim of Australia never being hotter was based on the entirely wrong set of numbers.
Here is a still from that vile video. It is of Gallant, who could have made a useful career posing for Ralph, but instead chose to waste her life crunching numbers about growth rates of Balinese coral and insisting they tell us much about the ancient climate of Tasmania. Don’t laugh, that is the sort of link the Gergis paper claimed to have established beyond doubt and scepticism.
A picture is worth a thousand words, as they say, and this one tells us everything a taxpayer needs to know about the credibility of the peer-review process and more tellingly, those who hang their hats upon its rotten peg.